Five years with the Human Brain Project

A PhD funded by the HBP Neurorobotics subproject — more than a line on a grant number.

January 2020 · Ghent University — HBP RoboticsNeuroroboticsAcademic WritingPublic SpeakingProposal Writing
← All articles

Between October 2015 and September 2020, my PhD at AIRO / IDLab – Ghent University – imec was funded by the Human Brain Project (HBP), one of the largest European flagship research programmes. Within the HBP, I belonged to the Neurorobotics subproject (SP10), whose mission was to connect spiking neural networks and simulated brain models to physical or simulated robots in a unified software stack: the Neurorobotics Platform (NRP).

Some of my research visible on this blog — mass-spring networks, Tigrillo, HyQ locomotion control — was carried out under HBP grants. HBP gave me the chance to meet neuroscientists, roboticists and computer scientists across the continent and to initiate cross-disciplinary partnerships and discussions.

Inside the Neurorobotics Platform

The NRP is a simulation environment that connects spiking neural networks with robotic systems. It lets researchers pair different brain models with simulated robots running on high-performance computing clusters, so that embodied experiments can actually be conducted at the scale the HBP aspired to. Within my PhD, I:

The platform has evolved since then and is now part of the EBRAINS infrastructure.

Education, student representation, community

Research consortiums of that size live and die on their education and community programmes. I was elected Student Representative at the HBP Education Programme Committee (a mandate that ran until May 2019), which meant representing ~150 HBP-funded PhDs across Europe in strategic discussions about schools, grants and workshops.

On top of that role, across five years I organized, hosted and contributed to the events below. They are pulled verbatim from my thesis and give a fair picture of what being inside HBP actually looked like:

Each of these events was an opportunity to present technical progress, but also — and more importantly — to negotiate with neuroscientists whether what we roboticists were doing actually deserved the adjective “brain-inspired”. The discipline that imposed on me — proving I had something worth telling a neuroscientist, and learning to listen — is probably the single most useful side-product of those five years.

What it taught me

Going further